On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:59 AM, ⚛ <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello. > > The result file at > http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1606180-PTS-MIDJUNEA78 is showing > multiple issues, some of them are: > > [Minor issue] Kernel 4.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160616 has a > performance regression on R9 290 > According to Phoronix, the issue with Michael's 290 is that DPM is stuck at a low-clock state[1]. I'm not sure if there's other issues at play (card model, bios, etc), but that would at least explain the large drop in performance for that card. [1] - http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Linux-4.7-R9-290-Regression > > [Major issue] R7 370 yields 133 FPS in Tesseract, while R9 285 > unexpectedly yields 111.81 FPS in Tesseract > > R7 370: 1996.8 GFLOPS > R9 285: 3290 GLOPS > > I would like this forum thread to identify the cause of the major > issue. So the question is: > > *** What might be causing R9 285 to perform worse than R7 370? *** > > (I don't have access to R7 370 nor R9 285. My current answer to the > question is: I don't know.) > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
