On 2016-06-13 12:02, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:

Meh. This is the kind of thing where Coverity should perhaps just shut up :/

I do agree with you that Coverity should perhaps shut up about this kinda thing but I couldn't see a reason to have these checks in the code. They really didn't contribute to my understanding of the code. Although I may be missing something
important here.

Anyway...
I think for consistency, you should also remove the '- PIPE_SWIZZLE_X'
here, similar to the first hunk. With that changed,

Forgot about that one. I agree with this change.

Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>

Thanks!
--
Mvh Jakob Sinclair
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to