On 7 June 2016 at 14:03, Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04.06.2016 05:26, Timothy Arceri wrote: > >> On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 13:12 +0200, ⚛ wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> >>> Situation: Looking at the content displayed by the web browser for >>> URL >>> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/mesa/series and sub-pages >>> accessible via the links. >>> >>> The following questions are troubling me: >>> >>> - How does a patch submitter know when a reviewer will take a look at >>> the patch? >>> - What is the order in which the reviewers are looking at the >>> patches? >>> - What is the influence of the default ordering (URL suffix >>> "?ordering=-last_updated") on the behavior of reviewers? >>> - What about those patches on the 10th page from previous year? Why >>> are they in the list? >>> - Do patch submitters regularly clean up outdated patches? >>> - Does a patch submitter receive a notification email when he/she >>> forgets about a patch over time? >>> >>> It seems to me that the current review process isn't as efficient as >>> it can be. >>> >>> Looking forward to your opinions and solutions. >>> >> >> We had a discussion about the use of patchwork around this time last >> year [1]. Since then I think we can definitely say people are making >> use of patchwork more than before (which was almost never). This is >> largely due to the great improvements made by Damien [2]. >> >> The take away is patchwork is still a work in progress and as others >> have said it is currently useful along side email. >> >> Personally I find it very useful for keeping track of my patches and >> think it would be great if others would clean out their old patches to >> make it easier to find unreviewed patches, >> > > Is there an easy way to do this? > > I just logged in again, went to Series, and was able to filter for mine - > but I see no way to mark series as Done from the site. Going to individual > patches is asking a bit much... > > Quick workaround - jump to Patches. From there you can manage multiple ones at a time. Alternatively there is the patchwork CLI which Rob C/Adam J seems to use rather often. Perhaps we could poke them to write a brief blog/how to ;-)
Generally speaking, it would be awesome if Patchwork were better at > identifying trivially modified patches, but I admit that that's tricky to > do. > > That's one of the the planned goals. Hopefully it's on the horizon. -Emil
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
