On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31 May 2016 at 18:54, Matt Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> From: Emil Velikov <[email protected]> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> src/mapi/glapi/gen/Makefile.am | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/src/mapi/glapi/gen/Makefile.am b/src/mapi/glapi/gen/Makefile.am >>> index c511de9..ab0dcab 100644 >>> --- a/src/mapi/glapi/gen/Makefile.am >>> +++ b/src/mapi/glapi/gen/Makefile.am >>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ BUILT_SOURCES = \ >>> $(MESA_GLX_DIR)/indirect_init.c \ >>> $(MESA_GLX_DIR)/indirect_size.h \ >>> $(MESA_GLX_DIR)/indirect_size.c >>> +CLEANFILE = $(BUILT_SOURCES) >>> EXTRA_DIST= \ >>> $(BUILT_SOURCES) \ >>> $(MESA_GLAPI_DIR)/glapi_gentable.c \ >>> -- >> >> Again doesn't this prevent you from rebuilding from a tarball after a >> make clean? > Can you please elaborate ? I believe that my argument for git_sha1.h > makes sense. Are you saying that the same/similar case applies here ?
From a tarball, if you run make clean it will delete files generated from python scripts. Since we don't require python to build from tarballs, there will be no way to regenerate them. Isn't that a problem? I don't think we should put these in CLEANFILES. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
