Hi Brian, I can see that the fix is in, so just a question for posterity.
On 11 April 2016 at 23:39, Brian Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > Instead of using an array indexed by SYSTEM_VALUE_x, just use a > switch statement. This fixes a regression caused by inserting new > SYSTEM_VALUE_ enums but not updating the mapping to TGSI semantics. > Considering the switch has a default statement, is there any benefit of going that way (we won't get any compiler warnings as we add new values) over using designated initializer* for the const data ? I'm leaning (although I've not tried it) that MSVC 2013 should be fine with the latter. It seems to work fine with structs at the very least. -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
