On 17 February 2016 at 18:31, Ernst Sjöstrand <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > Sorry if this is a silly question but I was thinking that there would > be a Vulkan Gallium state tracker in development behind closed doors > somehow. However I guess that's not the case?
It doesn't make sense to write a vulkan state tracker for gallium, as vulkan is a lower level interface than gallium, The only thing that makes sense is to refactor pieces of the gallium drivers out into some shared driver code, usually the compiler and memory layout stuff (like Intel have done). You could in theory write a vulkan level gallium layer, but it really would end up looking like vulkan so would just be an abstraction of an abstraction. Dave. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
