On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com> wrote: > > > On 02/12/2016 02:04 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: >> >> On 11 February 2016 at 12:03, Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com> wrote: >>> >>> From: Bernard Kilarski <bernard.r.kilar...@intel.com> >>> >> Here we should have justification why this is needed. If there is a >> program affected (or bugzilla ticket opened) do mentioned it as well >> please. >> > > These patches are part of bigger set (which I try to help to reduce) from a > internal customer branch with rather exotic stack and components. I'm not > sure if there's anything better than "we need more dynamic entries to be > available, current range is not enough" for justification here, does that > suffice?
No... we want to understand the code we're maintaining, and that means having justification for changes that go into Mesa. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
