Hi,
Thanks for the comments.
On Monday, May 02, 2011 13:14:02 Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > + if(bo->domains != domains) {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
>
> I wonder if this test isn't too strict, i.e. if there aren't cases where
> the values aren't identical, but where the BO should still be considered
> compatible, e.g. because one is a subset of the other. But the patch is
> probably an improvement regardless, and this could always be improved
> later on.
>From my point of view this is subject to experiment with.
For my test application, this gave slightly better performance than what I
have tried else.
But the hugest performance gain stems from the initial placement change and
from the more fine grained usage to placement mapping.
So for now I decided to send this variant ...
Greetings
Mathias
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
