On Friday 09 July 2010 17:35:36 Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:40 AM, Zack Rusin <za...@vmware.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 July 2010 15:00:55 Jerome Glisse wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> So after being of the grid i am resuming my epic on mesa demos. > >> I set version to 8.0 so it's easy for distro, and as fresh start for > >> demos on it's own. If no one object i will do the release by the end > >> of the week (this time i shouldn't find myself in a no connectivity > >> situation). > > > > Not that I care too much but I thought that when it was discussed a while > > back on the list the consesus was to keep the Mesa3D numbering scheme. > > 8.0 doesn't make much sense to me, i.e. having demos for mesa-7.8 in > > mesa-demos-8.0 is pretty silly. > > No it was not to epoch back to 1.0.0, the thing is demos should be > able to have an independent release schedule, > > its not like we are adding a huge number of demos that mean it needs a > major release when mesa gets one and a minor release when mesa gets > one.
But when we are adding them it's while implementing/fixing something in Mesa3D so obviously having the major numbers match would be beneficial. The releases don't have to match, major numbering certainly could. Actually I don't really care since all devs will use git anyway. z _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
