On 10/01/2011 11:19 AM, Gabriel Beddingfield wrote:
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Michael Hasselmann
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 10:13 -0500, Gabriel Beddingfield wrote:
With Intel removing the lion's share of those developer resources...
it would be foolish to continue that failed approach. It sets
everyone up for failure.
I feel as if you over-estimate Intel's software development efforts for
MeeGo.
Well... MeeGo loses Auke... and that's pretty darn big IMHO. :-)
I'm not going to bicker over head count or even quality. You wanna
support 5 verticals, go ahead. Make us all proud. I think it's a
plan for failure.
Why so much fuss about the different verticals?
This is up to the interest of the different volunteers, if someone wants
to work in a specific area, let it be; as long as there exist certain
coordination and a modular way of communication between the groups (as I
earlier proposed), everything should be fine, there is no need to set in
stone the exclusion of any of the verticals, or exclusively narrow down
MeeGo to a single one.
--- Luis
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
