ok, i am quiet. since 6 months (anroid marketshare = 17 %, see attached mail, today (as posted): 32 %) still no meego hardware. while other post "marketing wikis" and the thing with coloured tshirts, my understanding of development is not only technically, but strategically. you get no apps and developers if there is no hardware to test. time slot is getting to thin air..:
http://www.geekzone.co.nz/content.asp?contentid=9108 2010/8/13 Randolph Dohm <[email protected]>: > heya, you are an open source activist from nokia and want to push the meego > OS, > not only that android from last quarter rised from 1,7 % marketshare > to 17 % marketshare > (and blackberry has 18 %, while nokia struggles for 42 %) > but as well that android is now bundled over the "backdoor" - how > newspapers the fall-in call - of the portable playstation module > should justify the question, why intel is not choosing the portable > microsoft wii, but instead the nintendo gamboy for meego > and why nokia is not steering the process of finding a business > partner in nintendo for a gamepad "meegoboy" with meego OS? > PS: but I see, it is offtopic or political. > Regards > rd > > 2010/8/13 Quim Gil <[email protected]>: >> >> >> On 08/13/2010 09:51 AM, ext Randolph Dohm wrote: >>> Hi Quim >>> >>> is it true that intel in in discussions with nintendo to bring out a >>> mobile phone with a nintendo portable game pad phone? >>> http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/psp-mockupengadget.jpg >>> http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/exclusive-sony-ericsson-to-introduce-android-3-0-gaming-platfor/ >>> >>> Thought Nokia and not Intel is connecting the gamers? >> >> You might want to ask Intel about their business. :) Sorry but I don't >> understand your email, the relation with MeeGo and the fact that it's >> addressed to me. >> >> -- >> Quim Gil >> open source advocate >> MeeGo Devices @ Nokia >> > _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
