On 1/28/2011 6:32 AM, Carsten Munk wrote:
2011/1/28 Arjan van de Ven<[email protected]>:
On 1/28/2011 4:04 AM, Carsten Munk wrote:
Hi,
We just noticed we (N900 images) seem to be the only ones using btrfs
on Handset images[1] [2]. When was this change made and is it an
error? If not, why?
Do we have a new default filesystem for the default configuration?
MeeGo's default filesystem is BTRFS (and has been since before MeeGo 1.0)
Unfortunately some hardware adaptation's have a buggy
bootloader-architecture currently and are unable to use BTRFS.
(and somehow making a small /boot that is ext3 with / being btrfs is
hard....)
This is detrimental to performance and storage use on those platforms, and I
would expect that the owners of those platforms
have a vested interest to fix these issues to make their platforms work
better with MeeGo and at least match their competition in features and
performance...
But sometimes my expectations don't match reality.
Agreed - we're using btrfs as there's benefits to using it (COW really
helps when copying sample media on startup) and because we were told
to :)
Shouldn't we have at least one set of the IA images to be using btrfs?
That is, in order to weed out issues related to btrfs in MeeGo in
image creation and be sure we've QA'ed this for both architectures?
Currently, -none- of the .ks'es on IA are using btrfs. Perhaps netbook
does upon install, but that won't help in image creation QA.
hmm netbook for sure gets btrfs, but that indeed might be installer only
(which I would consider weird... don't know why it's not using btrfs for
the live image)
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev