On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Tim Teulings <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So bobapp's web page and package description would say: > * This is the wonderful bobapp. It is Meego compliant for Device Zupp and > Device Wusch but not for Device ExtraLess. > > Is this the kind of complicance statement that e.g. marketing has ordered > ;-)? Would such compliance statement be of any help? > > The bobapp statement holds anyway, if the vendor of ExtraLess decides not to allow it. In those terms Compliancy has limited value for the *user* as it does not guarantee in any way that bobapp will or will not be obtainable/allowed on a certain device. Unless marketing wants to get into the business of saying 'well that means it COULD run it, not that YOU can run it'. Best regards, Attila
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
