On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Warren Baird wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Alexey Khoroshilov > <[email protected]> wrote: >> let's leave UX profiles out of the consideration for now > > Hmm - that raises something that doesn't seem to be covered by the > spec --- does a 'MeeGo Compliant App' have to run well on *all* UX's? > > That could be a lot of work for some apps - anything designed > specifically for netbooks for instance might not work on a Handset or > Vehicle UX without a lot of tweaking. This is a very good question.
I think we need to enable both "universal" MeeGo applications that run well on any device and also vertical-specific applications that are tuned and optimized for a specific device category. > > Do we need to have "MeeGo Compliant" - which implies all UX's as well > as "MeeGo NetBook Compliant" / "MeeGo HandSet Compliant", etc? Consistent with the idea of device profiles - I think it makes sense to have a "Universal MeeGo Application" and "MeeGo Handset App", "MeeGo Netbook App", etc. -Mark > > Thoughts? > > Warren > > P.S. I don't know how many times I've nearly typed "MeeGo Complaint" > in this thread... > > -- > Warren Baird - Photographer and Digital Artist > http://www.synergisticimages.ca > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
