> ----- Original message ----- > From: "Carsten Munk" <[email protected]> > To: "Sivan Greenberg" <[email protected]> > cc: "Randall Arnold" <[email protected]>, "MeeGo community" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [MeeGo-community] A 'red thread' through MeeGo Conference proposals > Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 23:04:03 +0200 > > >2010/9/4 Sivan Greenberg <[email protected]>: > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Carsten Munk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd personally like the merging to be asked by program committee > >> instead. If we can see there's a benefit to merging, I feel it would > >> be natural to reach out to the proposers to see if they can work > >> something out. > > > > I believe merging could be good, but we should only ask it if we are > > absolutely sure > > a merge would be beneficial. �OTOH, what do we do if we ask some to > > merge or collaborate > > and they don't think that sessions/presentations can be > > consolidated?They might have > > better idea what they're going to present that what might the program > > committee realize > > from the brief description , or no? > > I have a nice 200 page text file with all the proposals, no, they're > not very brief ;) But let's get to a point where we might have to > choose first or are running out of program space. Either way, proposal > processing is largely a black box. We'll do our best to do the right > thing. > > BR > Carsten Munk >
Even without consolidation, we all need to be aware of each other's talks and reference/attribute work to reinforce the messages.� So once the accepted proposals are published I humbly request all presenters to cross-reference other talks and BoFs in their materials. Randy -------------------------------------------------------------- Ovi Mail: Making email access easy http://mail.ovi.com
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
