Em Sexta-feira 28 Maio 2010, às 15:46:22, Markus escreveu:
> Am Freitag 28 Mai 2010, 13:48:30 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> > I think the answer is quite simple: there are no good, productised
> > QtWebKit- based browsers yet.
> 
> And why's that? At least on the handheld front the MeeGo and Symbian teams
> both need a browser and Fennec for Symbian is nowhere on the horizon. Hence
> Nokia needs to develop it anyway.
> 
> > Yes, there's Arora. And I'd love to see it as an option. But is it good
> > enough already?
> 
> Arora's GUI needs a few tweaks, but besides that Arora is quite capable
> already.
> That said, nobody is suggesting to disallow optional installation of other
> browsers. I just think the defaults should fit lower end devices.

Maybe we will get a QtWebKit-based browser in the future, as another option. 
As it stands, having an option to choose your browser is beneficial.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to