Hi Manu

You mike take a look at the TinyMCE extension 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:TinyMCE, which was derived from that 
in Bluespice as an alternative to Visual Editor.  It just provides a WYSIWIG 
interface to Mediawiki using the popular TinyMCE jvascript editor.  It cohabits 
with the mediawiki editor and you can easily switch between them, disable 
TinyMCE on given pages or namespaces etc.  

Kind regards, Duncan

-----Original Message-----
From: MediaWiki-l <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Emanuele D'Arrigo
Sent: 22 November 2018 15:13
To: Mediawiki Users List <[email protected]>
Subject: [MediaWiki-l] The advantages of Wikitext

Hi everybody,

in the context of our neighborhood's MediaWiki installation (about 100
users) I'm dealing with a problem that probably many MW administrators have 
faced before: for technical reasons (and my own limitations) I'm not in a 
position to easily install the Visual Editor and I need to help a very 
etherogenous group of people understand the philosophy and the advantages of 
WikiText compared to what they are used to: Microsoft Word or similar.

I feel I might have to install Bluespice, as it seems to have a WYSIWYG editor, 
but I also feel that would be giving up on the WYSIWYM editor, which is a 
feature, not a bug.

I found a few texts on the matter, but they all seem to be a bit outdated.
They also tend to make no mention about the accessibility concerns that somehow 
wikitext, among other things, tries to ameliorate.

Can anybody recommend some resources in this context?

Kind regards, Manu
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
To unsubscribe, go to:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l



_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
To unsubscribe, go to:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Reply via email to