So this is not an issue after all? No? Cheers Karsten Am 21.06.2018 um 10:24 schrieb [[kgh]]: > Thanks a lot for sharing your solution to the problem. However, this > sounds like a bug to me that should be fixed. > > I however do not know how you ended up with 0 instead of NULL and if > this could also have happened to other users of MW using the special > page in the past to change the content model. > > I understand that some developers are on this list too who can easily at > least assess if there is an issue. Let's wait for their reply. > > Cheers Karsten > > > Am 21.06.2018 um 02:19 schrieb David Bohman: >> I got past the problem. It appears that MW 1.31 is not as permissive about >> the value of rev_content_model in the revision table. I had entries in the >> table which were 0, and MW 1.30 did not have a problem with it. However, >> 1.31 only accepts a value of NULL, otherwise it barfs. >> >> Anyhow, I fixed it by forcing the 0 values in the revision table to their >> default value. The logic seems to be to be to use the content model from >> the revision if it is set to non-null, otherwise use the value in the page >> table. I suspect that earlier versions of MW accepted a revision content >> model of 0 as the same as NULL. >> >> David Bohman >> _______________________________________________ >> MediaWiki-l mailing list >> To unsubscribe, go to: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l > > > _______________________________________________ > MediaWiki-l mailing list > To unsubscribe, go to: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
_______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list To unsubscribe, go to: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
