Just use Flow.

LQT is severely buggy due to its reliance on wiki pages for message
storage. It resulted in a very deep hooking into the MediaWiki internals,
causing endless breakages.

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Jason Ji <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> My team at the MITRE Corporation is considering using the LiquidThreads
> (LQT) code base as a starting point for a new commenting extension we are
> writing. We would either fork LQT and work directly on the existing code,
> or at least use the code as inspiration or a basis for how to start
> designing our own extension.
>
> I'm aware that development of LQT was canceled over three years ago - can
> anyone shed some light on the backstory of why it was abandoned? If there
> were some fundamental technical flaws with the extension, that would be
> good for us to know if we shouldn't waste our time; on the other hand, if
> it was more of a policy/philosophy reason, then that would also be good for
> us to know, to see if that reasoning applies to our needs.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Jason Ji
> The MITRE Corporation
> _______________________________________________
> MediaWiki-l mailing list
> To unsubscribe, go to:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>



-- 
Best regards,
Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
To unsubscribe, go to:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Reply via email to