Thank you very much for touching this topic!
On 02/07/2013 03:27 AM, Mariya Nedelcheva Miteva wrote:
As I have been talking to third-party MW users quite a lot recently, I
notice that one of the major issues they are facing is the lack of
visibility on MW.org.
Proposals welcome.
I have seen some previous work like that has been
reverted because WMF does not want to endorse any external parties on mw.org.
[citation needed] :)
It would be useful to know about these reverts in order to understand
the reasons and how we all can do better next itme.
However, at the same time I see some pages featuring such users such as
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_testimonials and
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_with_BitNami. So my question here
is how much is acceptable?
Totally acceptable?
The only limitations I can think of are the usual: unmaintained, broken
or unsecure software, misleading use of trademarks or ownership... Other
than that this is a free software project interested in promoting the
activities of the community and remarkable uses done by third parties.
--
Quim Gil
Technical Contributor Coordinator @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
