On 15/10/12 17:52, Mark A. Hershberger wrote: > On Mon 15 Oct 2012 11:25:28 AM EDT, Platonides wrote: >> I probably messed up myself. What revision did you use for the rc1? > > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/27370/ plus the attached diff (which > I cannot now submit because of firewall issues).
I have submitted it for you https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/28296 [92525a496c6b77a044dae42ebe6360b08093cf9c] I also set a tag 1.20.0rc1 to that revision (or so I think) For the record, the differences with the tarball are: > Only in core/: .git > Only in core/: .gitignore > Only in core/: .gitreview > Only in core/: .jshintignore > Only in core/: .jshintrc > Only in core/docs/html: .gitignore > Only in core/extensions: .gitignore > Only in core/includes/zhtable: .gitignore > Only in mediawiki-1.20.0rc1/extensions: ConfirmEdit > Only in mediawiki-1.20.0rc1/extensions: Gadgets > Only in mediawiki-1.20.0rc1/extensions: Nuke > Only in mediawiki-1.20.0rc1/extensions: ParserFunctions > Only in mediawiki-1.20.0rc1/extensions: Renameuser > Only in mediawiki-1.20.0rc1/extensions: Vector > Only in mediawiki-1.20.0rc1/extensions: WikiEditor Basically, removal of config files which are there just for development. I'm not sure if we should include the bundled extensions as submodules in the tagged releases. Opinions? PS: Note that REL1_20 got a new fix for bug 40780. I would delay the release and try to get the listed bugs with patches merged for 1.20. As those are changes from rc1, IMHO we should also ship a rc2 before going final. _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
