Yea, another annoying feature of the FCKeditor is it trying to make sense of 
what it does not understand, like some extension tags, leading it to mangle 
them, like replacing < and > with &gt and &lt.  If your users are going to use 
an extension's features and FCKeditor is going to mangle them then this may be 
a real issue.  I use the Inputbox but I tend to be the only one editing those 
pages and I normally use wikitext as my default editor.  

Still, overall, the FCKeditor is accepted pretty well here but we only add 
extensions to a wiki when a user requests it.  Normally only Cite and FCKeditor 
are added, and FCKeditor understands and uses Cite.  I've installed various 
Calendar extensions, Widgets, and CategoryTree with no complaints but that 
doesn't mean the users have run into all the possible problems.

-Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: David Gerard [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 2:35 PM
To: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list
Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Least-worst present WYSIWYG solution?

On 10 February 2011 19:24, Sullivan, James (NIH/CIT) [C]
<[email protected]> wrote:

> The FCKeditor does not handle these image attributes, just size, position and 
> caption, which was my only point about links, and yes, I consider it "fancy" 
> since most users do not add these attributes to their images.  If they did I 
> would be getting a lot of complaints about using the FCKeditor wrt images.


This is most promising :-D Yes, if they want to do fancy image
attributes they can use wikitext :-)

My last experiment with FCK was hampered by it messing up the tags
used by Extension:InputBox - our users are very fond of the "Create an
article!" box I put on the front page of our internal wikis, but
ediitng the page in FCK mangles it. Has anyone else encountered this?
Or even solved it?


- d.

_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Reply via email to