Raffaele Recalcati wrote:
> a group of users have to read and write all documents.
> another group of user have to read and write only a subset of these documents.
> 
> We have already many documents in mediawiki 1.13.2, so porting to
> another not compatible format is a work.
> If I want to use confluence, for example, I need a translator, that
> exist, I know, but also I need the translator to come back to
> mediawiki format, that is the most standard wiki format.
> The back translator is also needed to check to translator from
> mediawiki to confluence, because I need an automatic test.
> doc in mediawiki --> doc1 in confluence, or another --> doc' in mediawiki
> if doc and doc' are equal (with files attached as well) than it
> possible that doc1 is equal to doc.
> The back translator is needed also in order not to move definitely to
> confluence.
> 
> There is CMS natively compatible with mediawiki ?

You *can* use mediawiki for that. There are some extensions which allow
it. See
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Page_specific_user_rights_extensions

*But* since mediawiki is not designed for that, there might be some hole
through which your restricted users get access to content they were not
supposed to.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Preventing_access#Restrict_viewing_of_certain_specific_pages

If the wiki isn't hosting highly sensitive documents, one of those
extensions may be good enough for your needs.


_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Reply via email to