Rolf Lampa [RIL] wrote: > 2. $wgParserCacheType * Cache for the result of rendering a page. Rendering the wikitext is very intensive, thus it should be cached.
> 3. $wgMessageCacheType * // found no documentation It refers to the interface messages. They are used all the time. It's a good idea to cache them. > == Question 2 == > > What are the benefits and draw backs with using either of the two > options below, after excluding the other options? > * CACHE_DB > * CACHE_ACCEL - (eAccelerator in my case) CACHE_DB uses the database, and thus performs worse than a specific cache accelerator. It may also produce db deadlocks. CACHE_ACCEL seems a good solution for your case. If you had several servers, they would have independent caches, that's why memcached is preferred, but since it's on a single box, seems ok. _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
