"Francisco J. Huerta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So... you have pretty much made SACD and DVD-A irrelevant. No, not at all. SACD and DVD-A both offer better sound quality in the clearly audible range, as well. But you're right that my comment was a bit overreaching -- I was just irritated with the repeated use of alleged "specs" as a means to compare technologies. ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... las
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... Francisco J. Huerta
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... macdef
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Michael Hoffman
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Eric Woudenberg, Minidisc.org Editor
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... las
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... Stuart Howlette
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... macdef
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... macdef
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... macdef
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... Michael Hoffman
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Stuart Howlette
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... Michael Hoffman
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Richard Rudie
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Stuart Howlette
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Richard Rudie
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... Stuart Howlette
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Eric Woudenberg, Minidisc.org Editor
