Part of the problem may be the duplication of groups. There are also gallio-user<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!forum/gallio-user>and gallio-dev lists <https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!forum/gallio-dev>. There are several contributors, but the last check-in was in August. https://code.google.com/p/mb-unit/source/list. They have build server but it is down.
Those using gallio need to mobilize to keep the project alive. I've seriously considered forking it to github. I would really like a much simpler version of gallio (it currently tries to do everything for everyone), with plugins and extensions as separate projects. On Thursday, November 29, 2012 3:07:40 PM UTC-8, Andrew Stopford wrote: > > Hi, > > As many of you will have noticed the lists have gone very quiet and > development on the core and engine has all but reached a stand still. For a > while now I have been pondering how to simplify matters and although while > we all agree that Gallio and MbUnit are a powerful combination it has > reached a point where I think MbUnit needs taking back to its roots and > simplifying. I have started an early initial project but it is early days > and I really don't know where it will go (if anywhere) but if anyone would > like to pitch in and help then please let me know. > > Thanks > > Andy > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MbUnit.User" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mbunituser/-/Ce1h8fiPGa8J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mbunituser?hl=en.
