Why don't we just do something like this and then I can post the final results after?
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=575afb1ce4b07327e1c57b16 On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:03 PM, John Burwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Will, > > Would a discuss thread to get a lazy consensus of finalists work? > > Thanks, > -John > > [email protected] > www.shapeblue.com > @shapeblue > > > > > > On Jun 10, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Will Stevens <[email protected]> > wrote: > > OK. I agree with that. We may want to figure out how to vote on this since > we are voting on: > - which variations we want to allow for use > - how many to approve > > Etc... > On Jun 10, 2016 11:58 AM, "John Burwell" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Will, >> >> So long as I have been around, the PMC has never voted to accept the vote >> of the community. Since PMC members cast binding votes and all votes >> require a minimum number of bind ing votes, the notion of PMC “acceptance” >> is baked into all votes. If you feel we are ready for a vote, it should be >> sufficient to open a [VOTE] thread on dev@ explaining the changes to the >> marketing and trademark guidelines. >> >> Thanks, >> -John >> >> >> [email protected] >> www.shapeblue.com >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >> On Jun 10, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Will Stevens <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> @John, if you concerned about the PMC's ownership of the vote, we could >> potentially hold a vote after the public one to approve what the public >> vote chooses. Does this resolve any concerns you may have with this? >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Will Stevens <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I personally don't think the vote should be done in private@ for this >>> one. I think the vote should be held with all of the following lists >>> included: marketing@, dev@ and users@ >>> >>> I think it is important that the user and marketing teams who are using >>> ACS have a say on this topic as it is not code related and is more likely >>> to affect their use cases than that of a contributing developer. >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:38 AM, John Burwell < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Will, >>>> >>>> I agree that we need a vote, but I don’t see why it needs to be >>>> private. Since the conversation has been public, why don’t we vote across >>>> all committers on dev@? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -John >>>> >>>> [email protected] >>>> www.shapeblue.com >>>> @shapeblue >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 10, 2016, at 10:17 AM, Will Stevens <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I would like to bump this conversation. I would like for us to select >>>> a few of these and then vote on them in the PMC for the purpose of adding >>>> them to our official marketing and trademark guidelines pages. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Will >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Julia Simon <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Agreed, and Will, this looks great. A font for each element would >>>>> also need to be defined in the branding guidelines. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, 13 May 2016, Tim Mackey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> That's exactly what I had in mind, Will. >>>>>> >>>>>> btw, I rather like Julia's "contributor to" role logo idea as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> I feel anything which adds to brand identity and allows users to >>>>>> spread the word is a good thing. >>>>>> >>>>>> -tim >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Will Stevens < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> You are looking for something like this, right Tim? Pardon the >>>>>>> choice of font, I am not a designer and did not even try. :P We will >>>>>>> want >>>>>>> to make sure the font names are listed in the color pallet template. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1392076/apache_cloudstack-01.png >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Tim Mackey <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One observation I'd make is that the proposed logos all work well >>>>>>>> if you have a white (or light) background. It would be good to have a >>>>>>>> variant which allows for a dark background. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To my eye, most of the "powered by" statements are too small. I >>>>>>>> like the weight of #9, but wish it included the monkey. Maybe something >>>>>>>> along the lines of #8, but with the font size for the "powered by" of >>>>>>>> #9 >>>>>>>> with the "powered by" statement placed centered above the "apache >>>>>>>> cloudstack" emblem? I'm not a designer or I'd mock something up to >>>>>>>> better >>>>>>>> visualize what's in my head. For me, the monkey is part of our brand >>>>>>>> identity, and I'd hate to see it subordinate in a logo program. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -tim >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Will Stevens < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Haha. I am not sure if I should be taking that as a compliment or >>>>>>>>> not Giles. :P >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On the topic of the branding colors, I have not found any color >>>>>>>>> guidelines for marketing material (and I have looked). Is that >>>>>>>>> because we >>>>>>>>> don't have one, or is it just because my google foo is weak? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> While I agree the the "color" version is the most consistent with >>>>>>>>> the current branding, is there anything that says we can't use colors >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> better match the context in which the graphics are used? If we do >>>>>>>>> want to >>>>>>>>> restrict the colors, I think we should definitely think about >>>>>>>>> creating a >>>>>>>>> color guide which we all use. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I ask because the graphic designer in me actually likes the dark >>>>>>>>> blue version in many cases. In addition to that, we will need to >>>>>>>>> increase >>>>>>>>> our marketing activities going forward and having quality guidelines >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> resources will help us present a cleaner and higher quality message. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't want to derail this conversation, but I thought it was >>>>>>>>> relevant considering Giles comments. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Giles Sirett < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Andre – this is great work – thanks for progressing >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I agree 100% with everything Will said >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (which is strange for me) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I’ll refine his comments a little more >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Although I like the novelty of 6, I think 7 will be more usable. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think both 8 and 9 would be useful in different situations >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, if possible I’d suggest that we publish 7,8 and 9 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I suggest that we only publish the blue versions of each as the >>>>>>>>>> colour is quite intrinsic to the brand >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I’m sure some people will disagree. If anybody does, shout in the >>>>>>>>>> next day or two and we can have a vote on this list so Andre can >>>>>>>>>> progress >>>>>>>>>> (which I think will be the first ever vote on marketing@) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kind Regards >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Giles >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> www.shapeblue.com >>>>>>>>>> @shapeblue >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *From:* Will Stevens [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 12 May 2016 16:48 >>>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Supported by ACS logo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think that #4 and #5 are the least useful because Apache >>>>>>>>>> CloudStack is not mentioned and the monkey alone does not have >>>>>>>>>> enough brand >>>>>>>>>> recognition in order for those to effectively present the Apache >>>>>>>>>> CloudStack >>>>>>>>>> project (IMHO). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> #6 and #7 are my favorite vertical versions. #8 and #9 are my >>>>>>>>>> favorite horizontal versions. I think in some situations #1 will >>>>>>>>>> also be >>>>>>>>>> useful. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Cyrano Rizzo <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Andre, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Congratulations by the great job! All of them are very good, I >>>>>>>>>> think the 3/9 and 2 are the best, in this order. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I didn't get the difference between 3 and 9, unless the size. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> []´s >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cyrano Rizzo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +55 (11) 99769-9001 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Universidade de São Paulo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Walter, André < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello to all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the miss out, our security rules were too strong ;-). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The URL http://poweredbycloudstack.bitcloud.cloud/ should be >>>>>>>>>> accessible now from everywhere and we are looking forward for your >>>>>>>>>> comments >>>>>>>>>> and feedback. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Von:* Giles Sirett [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 11. Mai 2016 20:15 >>>>>>>>>> *An:* <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: Supported by ACS logo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes - me too >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kind Regards >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Giles >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> D: +44 20 3603 0541 <+44%2020%203603%200541> | M: +44 796 111 >>>>>>>>>> 2055 <+44%20796%20111%202055> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> www.shapeblue.com >>>>>>>>>> @shapeblue >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 11 May 2016, at 17:10, Julia Simon <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi André, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am having trouble accessing that url. Would you check to make >>>>>>>>>> sure it's valid. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Danke schön! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Julia >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Walter, André < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello to all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> sorry for the delay, but our designer was off for some weeks. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But finally we have put together some proposals and I personally >>>>>>>>>> like the idea with the “stamp “ (option 5 or 6) best. So you can >>>>>>>>>> stamp your >>>>>>>>>> homepage or any other Marketing Material with “powered by ACS”. And >>>>>>>>>> we can >>>>>>>>>> easily include the proposal of Giles and replace the slogan “powered >>>>>>>>>> by” >>>>>>>>>> with "supporter of" or "contributor to" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kindly have a look at following URL >>>>>>>>>> http://poweredbycloudstack.bitcloud.cloud/ and we are looking >>>>>>>>>> forward for your comments and feedback. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *André Walter* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BIT.Group GmbH >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> T +49 3591 5253 1415 >>>>>>>>>> F +49 3591 5253 9999 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> M +49 160 90822573 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> E [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Von:* Giles Sirett [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>>>> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 23:23 >>>>>>>>>> *An:* <[email protected]>; Sally Khudairi >>>>>>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: Supported by ACS logo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Andre - welcome to the community - great to see you here and I >>>>>>>>>> look forward to working with you and your colleagues >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's great news that you can dive straight in with this important >>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I can't find the old thread on this, but in summary I think it >>>>>>>>>> stalled because the cloudstack logo didn't fit nicely inside the >>>>>>>>>> "powered >>>>>>>>>> by" circle that Sally references ( it resulted in the cloudstack >>>>>>>>>> logo being >>>>>>>>>> very small) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe it could be made to work bu somebody with an eye for >>>>>>>>>> design. But as ilya says, we don't have to stick with that design - >>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>> not obligatory >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe best to come up with some ideas and post a link here >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also : I've always thought that it would be good to give some >>>>>>>>>> options that are not just "powers by" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A few with words like "supporter of" and "contributor to" would >>>>>>>>>> be great >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kind Regards >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Giles >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> D: +44 20 3603 0541 <+44%2020%203603%200541> | M: +44 796 111 >>>>>>>>>> 2055 <+44%20796%20111%202055> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <image004.png> <http://www.shapeblue.com/> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Giles Sirett* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *CEO* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *, * >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *ShapeBlue* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *d: * >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *+44 20 3603 0541 | s: +44 203 603 0540* >>>>>>>>>> <+44%20%2020%203603%200541%20%7C%20s:%20+44%20203%20603%200540> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *m: * >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *+44 7961112055* <+44%207961112055> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *e: * >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] | t: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *w: * >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *www.shapeblue.com* <http://www.shapeblue..com/> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *a: * >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden London WC2N 4HS UK >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <image003.png> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. >>>>>>>>>> ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and >>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil >>>>>>>>>> Consultoria >>>>>>>>>> Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under >>>>>>>>>> license from >>>>>>>>>> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The >>>>>>>>>> Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue >>>>>>>>>> Ltd. >>>>>>>>>> ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. >>>>>>>>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are >>>>>>>>>> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is >>>>>>>>>> addressed. Any >>>>>>>>>> views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not >>>>>>>>>> necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. >>>>>>>>>> If you >>>>>>>>>> are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take >>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>> action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please >>>>>>>>>> contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in >>>>>>>>>> error. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 29 Jan 2016, at 01:14, Sally Khudairi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, André --your timing is good, actually. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We just launched the new ASF identity yesterday, and will >>>>>>>>>> continue rolling out the new assets over the next few months. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To that end, we have an existing "Powered By Apache" campaign >>>>>>>>>> that can be used generally or specifically with certain Apache >>>>>>>>>> projects. >>>>>>>>>> Please see http://apache.org/foundation/press/kit/#poweredby >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Again, given that our launch was just 26 hours ago, the icon for >>>>>>>>>> Apache CloudStack on file is the old one, but still very much valid. >>>>>>>>>> If >>>>>>>>>> this fits your needs, feel free to use as appropriate. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Warmest regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sally >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Vice President, Marketing & Publicity >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Apache Software Foundation >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> = = = = = >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> vox +1 617 921 8656 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> gvox +1 646 598 4616 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> skype sallykhudairi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *From:* "Walter, André" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> *To:* "[email protected]" < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 28, 2016 9:28 AM >>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Supported by ACS logo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am pretty new to CloudStack community and want to start my >>>>>>>>>> thread with a short introduction. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am working for BIT.Group GmbH and heading the area called >>>>>>>>>> “Cloud Services”. There we are delivering Infrastructure Management >>>>>>>>>> Services to big customers (mainly SAP) with a clear focus on open >>>>>>>>>> source >>>>>>>>>> technologies. That means we do classical IT outsourcing specialized >>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>> implementing and operating virtualization and OS layer with Experts / >>>>>>>>>> Administrators in Germany (Dresden) and China (Shanghai). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Giving this background we started last year to build up an own >>>>>>>>>> “BIT.Cloud” and decided to use Apache Cloud Stack and Ceph as focus >>>>>>>>>> technologies. Our experiences with ACS are really good (clearly we >>>>>>>>>> find the >>>>>>>>>> one or the other optimization potential ;-)), we had great >>>>>>>>>> interactions in >>>>>>>>>> the community already and we decided to deepen our involvement. So >>>>>>>>>> hopefully you will hear now inputs from our side quite more often >>>>>>>>>> and we >>>>>>>>>> especially want to increase the CloudStack presence in the German >>>>>>>>>> speaking >>>>>>>>>> area. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What we currently miss is a kind of “supported by ACS” logo, >>>>>>>>>> because we want to publish our Cloud offering with a clear statement >>>>>>>>>> of our >>>>>>>>>> focus technologies. I heart that there were already discussions in >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> past, but somehow it did not come to an end. Do you also see the >>>>>>>>>> need or in >>>>>>>>>> general would you support the initiative to get such a logo? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In case most of you answer the question with yes, I see following >>>>>>>>>> main questions: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> · Would you use the cloud stack (word), the monkey logo >>>>>>>>>> or the combination of both? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> · Are there any legal restrictions which we have to >>>>>>>>>> consider (e.g. does somebody has to approve this from ASF side?) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> · Do you know why the initiative in the past did not >>>>>>>>>> succeed? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> · Did someone in the past already created some drafts or >>>>>>>>>> similar? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> · In case we have some logo proposals clearly some will >>>>>>>>>> like it and some won’t. Will we start a voting procedure or how does >>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> work usually? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please excuse this maybe stupid questions, but as I initially >>>>>>>>>> wrote, I am quite new to this J. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My wish would be, that everybody can use such a “supported by” >>>>>>>>>> logo in case he wants to and I would offer to engage our designer, to >>>>>>>>>> prepare some design proposals and share the results with you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am looking forward for a fruitful discussion and your feedback. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *André Walter* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cloud Services >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BIT.Group GmbH >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> T +49 3591 5253 1415 >>>>>>>>>> F +49 3591 5253 9999 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> M +49 160 90822573 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> E [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This email was Virus checked by UTM 9. http://www.sophos.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related >>>>>>>>>> services: >>>>>>>>>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build >>>>>>>>>> <http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build/> | CSForge – >>>>>>>>>> rapid IaaS deployment framework <http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> >>>>>>>>>> CloudStack Consulting >>>>>>>>>> <http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> | CloudStack >>>>>>>>>> Software Engineering >>>>>>>>>> <http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/> >>>>>>>>>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support >>>>>>>>>> <http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> | >>>>>>>>>> CloudStack >>>>>>>>>> Bootcamp Training Courses >>>>>>>>>> <http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Julia Simon *Opérations marketing et ventes *| *Marketing & >>>>>>>>>> Sales Operations >>>>>>>>>> t 514.447.3456 ext. 1103 <514.447.3456%20ext.%201103> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> c 514.993.6661 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *CloudOps *Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions >>>>>>>>>> Experts >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cloudops.com >>>>>>>>>> <http://www.cloudops.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=cloudops-dot-com-url&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>>>>>>>> *| *420 rue Guy *|* Montréal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <image001.jpg> >>>>>>>>>> <https://cloud.ca/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=cloud-ca-logo-1&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>>>>>>>> <image001.jpg> >>>>>>>>>> <http://www.cloudops.com/2014/11/cloudops-tops-deloittes-technology-fast-50/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=fast-50-logo-1&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *Julia Simon *Opérations marketing et ventes *| *Marketing & Sales >>>>> Operations >>>>> t 514.447.3456 ext. 1103 >>>>> c 514.993.6661 >>>>> >>>>> *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts >>>>> cloudops.com >>>>> <http://www.cloudops.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=cloudops-dot-com-url&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>>> *| *420 rue Guy *|* Montréal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <https://cloud.ca/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=cloud-ca-logo-1&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>>> >>>>> <http://www.cloudops.com/2014/11/cloudops-tops-deloittes-technology-fast-50/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=fast-50-logo-1&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
