* Nico Huber <[email protected]> [2017-04-01 12:48]: > On 01.04.2017 04:22, Fletcher T. Penney wrote: > > 2. To me, this seems to be a rather idiosyncratic request. > > I understand that it is a desirable feature to you, but I suspect > > the number of others who desire this feature is quite low (witness > > that most replies don't even *understand* your request, much less > > support it.) > > I thought the general idea behind Markdown is to mark up text while > maintaining readability (of the untransformed source). And I doubt the > reaction on this list counts as representative.
The constituency for this feature would be people who manually hyphenate their plain-text documents. That makes me very sure that the reaction on this list is representative. > > 4. As to your specific syntax suggestion, this would not work well > > in MultiMarkdown, as the `\\\n` syntax is already used to indicate > > linebreaks, in addition to the ` \n` (space-space-newline) to > > improve visibility. > > > > <http://fletcher.github.io/MultiMarkdown-5/escaped-newlines.html> > > Every language where I've seen escaped new-line chars so far, used it > to ignore the line break. That’s exactly what Fletcher just said MultiMarkdown already does. > We should fix MultiMarkdown then ;) just kidding What’s there to fix? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
