> On Sep 5, 2014, at 5:28 AM, mofo syne <[email protected]> wrote: > > The second issue, is that people find it hard to have to deal with > formatting the pipes. If alignment of cell data is of no concern to > the user, then we should use CSV data as the inspiration.
I've long been (openly) of the opinion that tables are not prose, and therefore do not belong in markdown - except to fall back to raw HTML (see the philosophy section of the syntax rules). On the other hand, I recognize that sometimes a simple, unstyled table of simple tabular data has it's place and having to revert to raw HTML is a little much. So, CSV -- I like it. Plain, raw cvs gets converted to a table. That is something I might be able to get behind. Not sure I like your headers though. Why can't they be comma separated as well? Perhaps one character (at the beginning of the first line) could identify that line as a header. Without that character, then you get no header. Yes, that means you loose any ability to style, but I'm okay with that -- use raw HTML if you want more control. Waylan Limberg _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
