I was looking at the license which is shown as applicable to all Gruber versions at http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/license. There is a license condition involving the name, although it is difficult to know when it applies. Certainly violating the condition is a breach of the license. This peculiarity also makes the required propagation of the license text tricky since the text must be included “as is”: * Neither the name “Markdown” nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. The safe thing, of course, is to not use the name “Markdown” on a derivative work. I also note that the specifications and other on-line documents, such as they are, have copyright notices and no indication of license. I doubt that there has been much attention to this quirk and I, for one, am not going to go around to see what other so-called Markdown implementations have done with respect to honoring this license. -- Dennis E. Hamilton <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] +1-206-779-9430 <https://keybase.io/orcmid> https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A From: Markdown-Discuss [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff McNeill Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 18:20 To: [email protected] Subject: Markdown as genericized Markdown has become genericized (and was never registered or defended as intellectual property). See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_trademark
The idea that Gruber has to (or even ever would) sign off on anything is counter to his behavior and stated opinion on the matter. His historical involvement and contemporary non-involvement should not become an impediment or even an issue for markdown-related development. Sincerely, -- Jeff McNeill
_______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
