Hi, Kristian! On Apr 28, Kristian Nielsen wrote: > >> There is also https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4487 > >> (Replication from 5.6 with enabled GTID) to be considered. It's > >> currently Minor and has 10.0.x as a target version, both of which are > >> questionable: recently Colin said on IRC that it should be much more > >> than a minor FR, and yet I doubt that somebody will get to it in 10.0. > >> Maybe it's more realistic to raise the priority but to re-target it for > >> 10.1? > > I think Monty had some ideas for doing this, IIRC it was discussed at > the meeting in Barcelona in January. > > If what I remember is true, it is actually just that a 5.6 master > refuses to replicate if the slave does not say it is configured for > MySQL 5.6 GTID. The slave does not need to actually _use_ GTID. So I > think Monty's plan was for the MariaDB slave to just lie to the master > and say that it's a 5.6 slave with appropriate config. > > And the MariaDB slave would need to recognise and ignore the new MySQL > 5.6 events, such as GTID.
Fine. But the question was whether you think it should be a bug for 10.0.11 or it's big enough to consider it a task to do in 10.1? Regards, Sergei _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
