Hi, Stewart! On Aug 10, Stewart Smith wrote: > > > Suppose we instead make the decision on the _master_ on how to split > > up the replication stream for parallel apply. Instead of a single > > server-id for the master, we can have multiple - let us call them > > "Source ID". > > > > On the _master_, we will decide that two transactions in different > > databases are independent, and assign them different Source ID. > > How would this work with a cross database transaction that depends on > previous transactions in both database?
Same as in MySQL - it won't, so don't use per-database splitting in this case. You've missed the point, the main idea is about *where* to split the replication stream on parallel "independent" source streams. But *how* to split - is a separate question. There are many different approaches, per-database is just one of those. Regards, Sergei _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
