Title: RE: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer and PostGIS GEOMETRY type

Thanks, Frank. I wasn't aware I could do it like that.
We have been using FME (basic edition, without PostGIS support) for years, and I agree it's very good. My client will probably have to buy it either way, for many of their other tasks.

regards,

Jacob



-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Warmerdam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu 11/1/2007 08:49
To: Delfos, Jacob
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer and PostGIS GEOMETRY type

Delfos, Jacob wrote:
> Thanks, Flavio. Currently we're actually evaluating the "Professional
> edition" of FME. But I'd prefer to be able to recommend an Open-Source
> solution to our client, and I think ogr2ogr may be simpler to
> batch-process. But obviously at the end of the day I'll have to
> recommend whatever works best, even if it costs.

Jacob,

FME is an excellent investment for any shop doing a lot of GIS
data processing.  However, if the primary concern is splitting
a gis layer into geometry type specific layers, this can be
accomplished as described in the second FAQ at:

   http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/FAQVector

Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org


This email and any attachments are intended solely for the named recipient and 
are confidential. The copying or distribution of them or any information they 
contain by anyone other than the named recipient is prohibited. If you have 
received this document in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies 
from your computer system and destroy all hard copies. It is the recipient's 
responsibility to check this email and any attachments to this email for 
viruses before use.

Reply via email to