"Byunghee HWANG (황병희) via mailop" <[email protected]> writes:
> Julian Bradfield via mailop <[email protected]> writes: > >> Tonight I got bounces in my mailing lists with gmail.com refusing to >> accept messages relayed from virginmedia.com senders with the notorious >> 550-5.7.1 [2a00:1098:493::1 19] Gmail has detected that this message is >> 550-5.7.1 likely suspicious due to the very low reputation of the sending >> 550-5.7.1 domain. To best protect our users from spam, the >> message has been >> 550-5.7.1 blocked. For more information, go to >> 550 5.7.1 https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 >> ffacd0b85a97d-439b66de588si2560984f8f.502 - gsmtp >> >> It's not my domain they're maligning, so it's not my problem, but it seems >> odd >> that gmail should spamblock an entire fairly substantial UK-wide ISP. >> >> Anybody else seeing this? > > Hellow Julian, > > I believe "Reputation" is something that's difficult to define in the > world of email. I'll leave links to some helpful documents: > > [1] Peter's thoughts on Email world's Chaos: > <https://nxdomain.no/~peter/they_do_not_understand_mail_at_all.html> > > [2] Laura's short comments on Reputation: > <https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg26171.html> > > [3] Brandon's long comments on DKIM and Google: > <https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/-/raw/karma/DKIM/GMAIL-POLICY?ref_type=heads> Here's one more reference: (2026-03-01 Debian BTS message from Yahoo.FR) <https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/-/raw/3de5f6ec82d0c9158a9a94b8703e029607d2eec6/stuff/dkim-google.eml> This provides a glimpse into how important Google considers DKIM. Sincerely, Byunghee -- ^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
