On 17. mája 2025 18:28:43 UTC, Kasper Peeters via mailop <[email protected]> wrote:
>This has always struck me as a strange policy on the receiving end. If someone >sets up forwarding from server A to server B, then surely they want any mail >that passes A's filters to be delivered to their account at B, whether B >thinks it is spam or not? Why block A for a forwarding action, when you can >still see the original sender and block them instead? If on both, A and B, uses the same rules/admins, then yes. But consider situation, where they are both without any relation. Any user on A can setup forwarding to any/many address/es of B and then send SPAMs to A, which have to be unconditonally accepted on B? How hard will be to run dedicated A without any SPAM filter for this purpose? From B point of view, the A is the same remote host as any other, despite of any forwarding on it (without B's agreement). regards -- Slavko https://www.slavino.sk/ _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
