On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 11:37 PM, David Walser <[email protected]> wrote: > Götz Waschk <goetz.waschk@...> writes: >> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:42 AM, David Walser <luigiwalser@...> wrote: >> > As for the player, you don't really need a freeze push as it should be >> > somewhere >> > else in SVN. lastfm-player is what we currently have, but the new thing >> > is a >> > new application called lastfm-desktop. You don't need a freeze exception >> > for >> > a new package. >> Why that? It is just the new version of the old player with a redesign. > The tarball has a different name, so I would have left lastfm-player alone > (as it should still work too), and packaged the new one as a new package.
Sure, the 1.x version still works for subscribers, but you are missing the point: 1. the tarball was renamed from last.fm to Last.fm. 2. lastfm-player always was our name, not their's. 3. the of the binary was previously "Last.fm", now it would have been "Last.fm Scrobbler" but I have renamed it to Last.fm because mga2's rpmbuild broke with the space in the name. 4. the name of the old program reported by X was Last.fm in 1.x and is "Last.fm Scrobbler" in 2.1.33. > Also, the developers say the new one is kind of still getting feedback and > kinks > worked out and so on, so I'd think it'd be better to have both available for > now. I don't think so. It is working fine so far, no need to keep two versions. -- AL I:40: Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
