-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 20.01.2013 18:30, Robert Wood kirjutas: > Thanks for the reply, but it doesn't really make sense or seem to answer the > question. I was wondering why bother with v295 when you could go for a more recent (ie most up to date) release?! Our goal is to keep stable releases stable. New version may introduce regressions - this is not something we want to see in stable release.
- -- Sander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ/DgvAAoJECMkkFJIyHr8X8oH/3mZFCCIPjXSKtDzU+d42uIK yQxEYM+cO+hl5WhZHhi4pQ3HpNHcc77UltGdyV5I/glSknPB+cJtLbuDo/GHn7Ij Kfkvk+VuNN1GZ7KJRN2ejtcTheoW5mM87N1ForOre667kkiEf7p+JRdRhs71rAGk IxcrQjJ1A9egzuzmXF+zwzSNOU0gE/HC6MMGz6/PpJ5/fyGLwWreETy4ZmDQYz5e CZkkQproz+OY98I55nBwpgibkPH6OQKzp8QsSsop3Gv0WONrzxzVQuCasPOdL+yX DCjXkobMaSaRzbdrDMw7iv5yTxThtHZmqBWT5Uj2HTBlobiKh7C6Knh7l5CQ2hM= =jcee -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
