In my experience, you can switch back and forth easily. So you can use
either. Auto routing of signals was the biggest annoyance to me so far
(PyQt yes, PySide no). Well that and cross platform availability.

Frank

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Sivan Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Right, so at the moment PyQT supports more of the Qt bindings. But I think
> we should use PySide and help the PySide team enable more of the bindings we
> require, or at least ask them for those critical for the app development.
> Sivan
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Frank Banul <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> PyQt.
>>
>> Frank
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Andrea Grandi <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 22 February 2010 18:01, Gibran Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Do you think PySide could be used at some point?
>> >
>> > I'm going to use PySide :)
>> > Do you know any other working binding for Qt available for Maemo?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Andrea Grandi
>> > email: a.grandi [AT] gmail [DOT] com
>> > website: http://www.andreagrandi.it
>> > PGP Key: http://www.andreagrandi.it/pgp_key.asc
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > maemo-developers mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> maemo-developers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
>
>
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Reply via email to