Hi Loic On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 03:58:24PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > There are some dummy / dependencies-mostly packages in the maemo > archive such as haf-marketing-release or maemo-af-desktop-l10n which do > not carry much licensing information. The debian/copyright file is > along: > Copyright (C) 2006 Nokia Corporation > and pretty much nothing more. > > Would it be possible to clarify that the packaging or the full source > are under the LGPL for example? > > I don't think you *need* to explicitely declare the licensing of all > the packaging in all packages, but the mostly empty ones are without > any license, and that's a bit problematic. Perhaps you can simply add > a COPYING.LGPL file and a small statement that "this package is under > the LGPL version foo blahblah". Most likely those will be MIT (unless it's really incompatible with other licenses :))
Do you see other similar packages beside haf-marketing-release and maemo-af-desktop-l10n? -- Misha
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
