On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Lauri Leukkunen wrote:
> On 3/16/07, T Taneli Vahakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a project (at work, closed source). I can build it with
> > debian/etch or sb1. With sb2 it gets stuck (or rather, eats all
> > available memory ...) at the first step:
>
> I don't think it's the toolchain ;) Probably sb2.
>
> > % autoreconf -i -s --force
> > configure.ac:17: warning: AC_PROG_LEX invoked multiple times
> > ../../lib/autoconf/programs.m4:779: AC_DECL_YYTEXT is expanded from...
> > aclocal.m4:7657: AM_PROG_LEX is expanded from...
> > configure.ac:17: the top level
> >
> > (Here it starts occupying memory. The above messages do NOT
> > appear with etch or sb1.)
>
> Could be a kind of symlink loop, sb2 is not guarded against them and
> the mapping thing could create them where there really aren't any. You
> could try starting sb2 with --verbose and look at the
> buildroot/sb2_mapping.log for any hints at what it's doing.
Well, it goes on for a while and then stops. The last lines are:
[00_default.lua][.*|grep]:
__xstat(/home/taneli/buildroot/home/user/XXX/configure.ac) ->
(/home/taneli/buildroot/home/user/XXX/configure.ac)
[00_default.lua][.*|grep]:
open(/home/taneli/buildroot/home/user/XXX/configure.ac) ->
(/home/taneli/buildroot/home/user/XXX/configure.ac)
I can't tell if this is a good sign or a bad sign ...
> > Suppose I build it with sb1, should it work with glibc2.5?
>
> Probably. Although I'm not exactly sure what you mean ;)
Let me rephrase. Would this work (on N800), or am I going to
waste ummm... 10 minutes trying it myself:
% cp /bin/ls /media/mmc2/arm-lltc/bin
% chroot /media/mmc2/arm-lltc
% /bin/ls
(Supposing of course that /bin/ls is compiled against glibc2.3 or
whatever is in maemo3.0)
Taneli
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
