On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 17:51 +0100, ext Murray Cumming wrote: > Why does hildon-lgpl have the license in the name? Why isn't is part of > hildon-libs? > > I'm wondering whether this is just a historical thing. Maybe I should > wrap the hildon-libs widgets and the hildon-lgpl widgets in one module > for the C++ bindings.
Hysterical raisins. At some point it was considered that only a minimal set of widgets would be LGPL. Fortunately common sense kicked in since then :) Anyway, the current split is not exactly that clear or useful, so we're looking into how to group things better. For example HildonFileDetailsDialog is dragging in hildon-fm and gnome-vfs dependencies to hildon-libs. If you have ideas what kind of package / library grouping would make sense, we're open for suggestions. -- Tommi Komulainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list [email protected] https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
