On Dec 24, 2015, at 6:01 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 23 December 2015 at 16:12, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> Before I upgraded to OS 10.11 I had the gmsh and octave ports installed. >> Both depended on fltk. I am now reinstalling my ports per the migration >> instructions. The problem is that octave now depends on fltk-devel while >> gmsh depends on fltk and these conflict with each other. >> The strange part is that the octave port is the same rev that I had >> installed before the migration (@3.8.2_14). I don’t know when there might >> have been a change, or what it was. >> Is there any way to have both gmsh and octave installed? I am not sure if I >> should even file a ticket as it seems that there is not a bug in either >> port, just a conflict between them. > > I'm not maintainer of the Octave port, but the Portfile contains the > following comment & code: > > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/140782/ > > # for now on OSX 10.11, just use fltk-devel since fltk does not > # build; remove this condition with the next fltk release (noted > # in that Portfile too). > > if {${os.major} == 15} { > depends_lib-append port:fltk-devel > } else { > depends_lib-append path:lib/libfltk.dylib:fltk > > (You can try to run "sudo port install fltk" just to confirm that it's > indeed broken.) > > You should be able to work around the problem by installing fltk-devel > first, then gmsh and octave (gmsh is happy with either fltk or > fltk-devel, but it would install fltk by default if no binary is > already there). > > But you could just as well file a ticket (put michaelld in CC) to > apply the same kind of fix to gmsh as the one in octave.
fltk @1.3.3 installs fine for me on El Capitan. Maybe octave's El Capitan-specific dependency on fltk-devel should be reverted. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
