On Sunday August 11 2024 20:12:37 René J.V. Bertin wrote: >That's also why this isn't really an issue for me, except that I wouldn't mind >understanding what changed and if this is just a side-effect or something more.
The protection against multiple PortGroup inclusion probably *just* failed to bit me in the arse, given how I (was more or less forced to) designed my qt5-kde PG to interface with the mainstream PGs, bouncing the control flow around.
