-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joshua,
On 30.10.16 12:19 Joshua Root wrote: > On 2016-10-30 19:15 , Johannes Kastl wrote: >> Question 1: Is it possible to use different >> patchfiles-statements, depending on the variant? > > Yes. As the documentation (at least the pages I found) does not have an example of this, do you know of any port that uses this? >> Question 2: Is it possible to add another patch in one >> variant? > > Yes. see above. >> Question 3: Is there any reason why no +dnssec variant exists? >> Or why dnssec is not enabled by default (as long as the dnssec >> stuff is commented in the dnsmasq.conf it should not interfere, >> I guess)? > > Probably just nobody asked for it before now. That was my first guess. Johannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with SeaMonkey - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlgWFFoACgkQzi3gQ/xETbIvvwCeNYjoEpfjwZ6Mn2+/GZG8t72s PwwAn1ZzdE1rFqHFU5n4SaUNJ63LL9fv =RnpW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
