> On Oct 4, 2016, at 7:45 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Rainer Müller <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Patches should follow the patch-*.diff naming scheme, so this should be
>> named patch-skeyprune-man8.diff or similar.
>
> Popular opinion seems to be that we should relax that restriction.
>
> I think it's reasonable if we change it to "patch-*.diff or *.patch".
"patch-" and ".diff" are effectively synonymous, so I don't see any reason to
include both in a single patch name, as it's redundant and makes every patch
name longer. Plain "*.{patch,diff}" should be sufficient.
vq
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev