On 2016-04-08 02:06, [email protected] wrote:
> Revision: 147562
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/147562
> Author: [email protected]
> Date: 2016-04-07 17:06:46 -0700 (Thu, 07 Apr 2016)
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Add new pseudo-port selectors for port groups
>
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
> branches/portgroups-selector/base/src/port/port.tcl
>
> Modified: branches/portgroups-selector/base/src/port/port.tcl
> ===================================================================
> --- branches/portgroups-selector/base/src/port/port.tcl 2016-04-08
> 00:01:31 UTC (rev 147561)
> +++ branches/portgroups-selector/base/src/port/port.tcl 2016-04-08
> 00:06:46 UTC (rev 147562)
> @@ -1322,6 +1327,10 @@
> ^(revision):(.*) -
> ^(subport):(.*) -
> ^(subports):(.*) -
> + ^(group):(.*) -
> + ^(groups):(.*) -
> + ^(portgroup):(.*) -
> + ^(portgroups):(.*) -
> ^(license):(.*) { # Handle special port selectors
> advance
Here I added support for all of these forms:
group:foo
groups:foo
portgroup:foo
portgroups:foo
It feels kind of excessive to have four keywords for the same thing...
We usually refer to them as "port groups" (which is also the internal
name), but the shorter "groups" seems clear enough. The "port*" prefix
seems a bit redundant.
Any opinions?
Rainer
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
