On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:11 PM, René J.V. <[email protected]> wrote:
> - letting `port checksum` update the checksums removes much of the
> interest of verifying checksums ("the checksum doesn't match, do you want
> to update it?")
I would expect that you would need an option to enable updating, and get
the current behavior without.
Granting your other point, I still can't help but think that 60+ subports
is Doing It Wrong somewhere along the way. Perhaps KF5 should be a
PortGroup instead?
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
[email protected] [email protected]
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
