On 25 January 2016 at 18:55, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Jan 25, 2016, at 09:29, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>> (Even more than that I would really like to see the buildbots with
>> libc++ as their default stdlib being set up.)
>
> As far as I know nothing has changed on this front. I'm totally willing to
> set up libc++ build slaves for 10.6, 10.7 and 10.8, but cannot do so until we
> agree on a naming scheme to differentiate libc++ packages from libstdc++
> packages, implement that in base, and release it.
>
> Well, that would be a prerequisite for *distributing* such packages. I
> suppose we could set up build slaves that just build and don't distribute
> their packages. But that wouldn't be as helpful.
I opened a new ticket:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/50448
Mojca
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
