I might've misunderstood your question - you are correct, everything in
my repo is MK specific and I don't think it translates to anything in
LCNC.

On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 19:56:15 -0800 (PST)
justin White <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'll have to look into that but isn't protobuf/zeromq an MK thing
> that wouldn't readily exist in LCNC? A fella sent me an interesting
> email:
> 
> 
> > Does the mb2hal component run in MK?  I've played a bit with it on
> > LCNC, and Modbus is a pretty common and versatile protocol, either
> > the TCP or rs232 serial variants.
> >  
> 
> I've heard of mb2hal but never looked into it. It exists as a
> component in LCNC. I don't see it at all in MK source. I'd have to
> look into what I can do with it but since it's an RT shouldn't it
> "just work" in MK?
> 
> 
> On Thursday, December 5, 2019 at 10:40:20 PM UTC-5, mlampert wrote:
> >
> > I believe the functionality you're looking for is in 
> >
> > https://github.com/mlampert/Machinekit-Workbench/blob/master/MKServiceHal.py
> >  
> >
> > Anyway, it is indeed a programming interface and not a remote hal
> > shell. 
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 18:51:36 -0800 (PST) 
> > justin White <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: 
> >  
> > > Well honestly I was looking for something that had about as
> > > minimal programming approach as possible. The freecad approach
> > > doesn't seem to implement a hal style approach like setting pins,
> > > and signals from the client, it appears to be more of an MDI
> > > interface. I'd need full hal visibillity as I need command and
> > > feedback of pins directly. 
> > > 
> > > As was probably the original intention of LinuxCNC with someone
> > > like me in mind, I'm good with hal but not traditional
> > > programming languages. I have a friend that helps me with Python
> > > and C but I try not to throw huge projects at him. Like I said, I
> > > was unable to run halrmt in MK but I believe it seems similar to
> > > Linuxcncrsh with more hal abillities. I don't suppose that anyone
> > > has looked into improving these components? 
> > > 
> > > I might just be talking to the air here but if a userspace or RT 
> > > component (which does not exist yet) could  write telnet commands
> > > as pins that could be written to in hal, it could exist on the a
> > > client machine running a sim config that likely would not need an
> > > RT kernel. Hal-python could also read/write these pins/signals on
> > > the client side. On the RT hal side halrmt or similar would exist
> > > almost exactly as it does, just grabbing the telnet commands and
> > > commanding RT-hal. This approach would pretty much enable a
> > > linuxCNC machine to talk to an MK-CNC machine just using hal as a
> > > universal language. Completely GUI and language independent, if
> > > the interface can somehow set a hal pin, or give an MDI command
> > > it should work with this 
> > > 
> > > I'm certainly not married to telnet as a protocol, I just mention
> > > it because it exists and this communication path is not meant for 
> > > realtime critical things. If there is some existing way to do
> > > similar to what I mentioned I'd love to hear about it. 
> > > 
> > > On Wednesday, December 4, 2019 at 11:19:18 PM UTC-5, mlampert
> > > wrote:   
> > > > 
> > > > Not sure if you're looking for python or C++. In case it's the 
> > > > former you could use the base classes from the FreeCAD
> > > > workbench: 
> > > > 
> > > > https://github.com/mlampert/machinekit-workbench 
> > > > 
> > > > All files which start with MK... are independent of FreeCAD
> > > > and/or QT. The final class which ties everything together is in 
> > > > machinekit.py, which can also function without FreeCAD but it
> > > > does use a QT base object for signal propagation into the UI.
> > > > You can probably replace that quite easy with whatever GTK2
> > > > uses for signals/notifications. 
> > > > 
> > > > Other than that you are expected to call _update() in
> > > > machinekit.py periodically for service discovery and message
> > > > processing. 
> > > > 
> > > > HTH and let me know if you have any questions. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 18:17:42 -0800 (PST) 
> > > > justin White <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > > >     
> > > > > Every once in a while I sit down and try to get something
> > > > > going in QT creator for remaking  My project machine LinuxCNC
> > > > > GUI to QT for use with a remote instance of Machinekit. Right
> > > > > now this machine runs LinuxCNC with a mesa 7i96, and it works
> > > > > just fine, however my ideal setup is to use MKSOCFPGA on the
> > > > > DE10-Nano with the interface board I created to replace the
> > > > > mesa hardware and get the hal side off of the x86 PC. Getting
> > > > > a QT ui going would just be too much work even if I could get
> > > > > it started 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Problem is AFAIK all of the remote stuff is baked into 
> > > > > qtquickvcp, and not MK's gladevcp has nothing new. I'm fairly 
> > > > > certain I can get the existing GTK2 UI to run under MK as
> > > > > I've made a GTK2 test UI for my interface board that runs in
> > > > > both MK and LinuxCNC, but I'd need remote capabilities. The
> > > > > other day I was playing with linuxcncrsh and was able to
> > > > > control basic things on my MK test GUI with it but
> > > > > linuxcncrsh has no ability to set pins. I tried halrmt which
> > > > > supposedly does set pins but it does not seem to run on MK.
> > > > > From what I've read, linuxcncrsh and halrmt are both poorly
> > > > > coded so I don't think they are ideal anyway. I guess the
> > > > > basic question is is there any way to get machinetalk or any
> > > > > small useable portion of it to work with a GTK2 GUI?   
> > > > 
> > > >     
> > >   
> >
> >  
> 

-- 
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
https://github.com/machinekit
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Machinekit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/20191205201400.66efdd2b%40yolanda.

Reply via email to