On > Beaglebone specifics notwithstanding, the documentation is still lacking. > Your explanation is the same one given by every open source project that > lacks documentation. No one wants to do it (some, like swift.org, are > excellent, but it's backed by an organization with deep pockets and it pays > people to work on it). But that doesn't change the fact that it's lacking.
Yes, I notice the same trend. The open source projects that have actual budgets and corporate funding tend to have better documentation. One thing that might help is to lower the barrier to contributors. Put the docs on a Wiki. -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
